@Kola: There are a lot of instances where a client may have JS disabled. Many office IT departments disable it by default to prevent any issues with less experienced users.
Just because 99% of users (and that’s an exaggeration) use it doesn’t mean you should be lazy when building degradable markup.
Doug Says:
January 22nd, 2009 at 6:22 pm
Very well organized. Clean and simple.
Shaun Says:
January 22nd, 2009 at 9:36 pm
I love this UI. The effects are eye-catching, the layout intuitive yet feels fresh at the same time, and their work is downright inspiring
Robert Toby Says:
January 23rd, 2009 at 7:16 am
Simple, smooth and the effect is nice.
Dario Gutierrez Says:
January 23rd, 2009 at 11:36 am
I love the simplicity, the colors, transitions effects… everything!!
Alex Says:
January 23rd, 2009 at 11:36 am
Very nice
but doesn’t work with disabled JS
Mark Says:
January 23rd, 2009 at 6:27 pm
awww really…doesn’t work with disabled JS.
99% of all websites won’t work with JS disabled.
Gimme a break man.
Rob Says:
January 24th, 2009 at 5:26 am
@Mark. To be fair Alex has a point, especially the gallery could degrade a little nicer with JS off.
Other than that, very nice site.
Kola Says:
January 25th, 2009 at 11:20 pm
What’s the use of disabling JS? So you can just nitpick? What a douche.
Josh Harbaugh Says:
January 26th, 2009 at 10:26 am
It is a very nice site.
@Kola: There are a lot of instances where a client may have JS disabled. Many office IT departments disable it by default to prevent any issues with less experienced users.
Just because 99% of users (and that’s an exaggeration) use it doesn’t mean you should be lazy when building degradable markup.
gooddell Says:
June 20th, 2009 at 12:24 am
good….
ximelkez Says:
June 20th, 2009 at 12:24 am
ajib…