One would think having [student project] directly to the right of the title of the project would make it clear that it wasn’t a paid project for the client listed. Also, the description of those projects outlined which class it was for and a number of other class details.
The reason the ‘client’ was listed on those was mostly for consistency of all pieces. On student projects it clarifies who the pitch or project was for.
There was no misrepresentation. I guess I have to dumb it down further for some people.
24 Comments
Yea, misrepresenting your work is not cool. I do a lot of personal work but it’s clearly distinguished, so that’s pretty retarded
One would think having [student project] directly to the right of the title of the project would make it clear that it wasn’t a paid project for the client listed. Also, the description of those projects outlined which class it was for and a number of other class details.
The reason the ‘client’ was listed on those was mostly for consistency of all pieces. On student projects it clarifies who the pitch or project was for.
There was no misrepresentation. I guess I have to dumb it down further for some people.
What’s wrong with putting up personal work or school work? It still shows off your skills; it doesn’t always have to be about experience.
I agree about the righthand sidebar by the way, Baskerville italic is nice for headers but for the actual content? Not really imo.
Oh never mind, I read past the “passing it off as paid client work” line. Apologies.