I dont hide the fact that it is a graph paper press template, “fullscreen” is a great base.
John – What you do not mention in your comment is the hundred modifications to the template it self, custom category template, CSS, etc… to make it unique to our project
@Kelly no offense but be that as it may, I don’t see any different modifications to the template, then again I haven’t really dug deep, but seems pretty much the same. Good concept though and benefits charity though so what’s that matter right?
@Rich – true. No offense taken. There are mods, but it does not really matter. The credits states this site runs on WordPress and the Fullscreen theme. I dont try to pass it off as my own.
if that were the case, then your site belongs on a wordpress theme gallery. you already knew that the sites submitted to this gallery are made from scratch by hard-working developers.
and i’ve looked through the theme, even the inside is identical to the original sub template. WEAK
Yeah, kind of agree. It depends what your judging the site on, the content or the site design.
BWG is for showcasing websites, so probably not the best place for this site imo.
That being said and looking a little deeper into the site itself, viewing clouds by day/month for example, not much thought has been put in to the UX here, loads and loads of scrolling. Nothing really to special about the favorites, about or blog pages either.
All in all not the greatest, and especially as it is based on a theme….The Best of?….
@Rob. again, I agree. I am a photographer not a developer. I DID NOT ask to be added to this gallery.. it just happened. The theme, with a few mods was the best I could find to display my work. If you have ideas to make it better, send a proposal to kelly@clouds365.com and I will gladly pay your rate.
@Kelly – Most of the people on here are overly critical but yet if some of their work was featured here I’m sure everyone would have loads to say, I wouldn’t take it all to personally. The photography is good, maybe should throw together a portfolio site if you are shooting other things as well.
I don’t think there was any dispute at all on the quality of the photography. The quality of work and the concept is very good.
And I understand that sites get featured on design galleries without the authors recommendation or request. If you read up, all the comments above including mine are more aimed at the author of the design gallery sites, not yourself.
If that makes sense!
Also ‘Best of’ and ‘Photography’ are 2 seperate categeries, just a small point
If you look at it like ‘Best of Photography’ then by all means it deserves its place.
15 Comments
Does this look familiar? http://graphpaperpress.com/demo/?themedemo=fullscreen
haha good research!
nice template…
another WP template….
I dont hide the fact that it is a graph paper press template, “fullscreen” is a great base.
John – What you do not mention in your comment is the hundred modifications to the template it self, custom category template, CSS, etc… to make it unique to our project
haha…weak.
@Kelly no offense but be that as it may, I don’t see any different modifications to the template, then again I haven’t really dug deep, but seems pretty much the same. Good concept though and benefits charity though so what’s that matter right?
@Rich – true. No offense taken. There are mods, but it does not really matter. The credits states this site runs on WordPress and the Fullscreen theme. I dont try to pass it off as my own.
if that were the case, then your site belongs on a wordpress theme gallery. you already knew that the sites submitted to this gallery are made from scratch by hard-working developers.
and i’ve looked through the theme, even the inside is identical to the original sub template. WEAK
Yeah, kind of agree. It depends what your judging the site on, the content or the site design.
BWG is for showcasing websites, so probably not the best place for this site imo.
That being said and looking a little deeper into the site itself, viewing clouds by day/month for example, not much thought has been put in to the UX here, loads and loads of scrolling. Nothing really to special about the favorites, about or blog pages either.
All in all not the greatest, and especially as it is based on a theme….The Best of?….
@Rob. again, I agree. I am a photographer not a developer. I DID NOT ask to be added to this gallery.. it just happened. The theme, with a few mods was the best I could find to display my work. If you have ideas to make it better, send a proposal to kelly@clouds365.com and I will gladly pay your rate.
@Rob – “Best of…?”
Photography. Read the title haha…
@Kelly – Most of the people on here are overly critical but yet if some of their work was featured here I’m sure everyone would have loads to say, I wouldn’t take it all to personally. The photography is good, maybe should throw together a portfolio site if you are shooting other things as well.
@Rich + @Kelly
I don’t think there was any dispute at all on the quality of the photography. The quality of work and the concept is very good.
And I understand that sites get featured on design galleries without the authors recommendation or request. If you read up, all the comments above including mine are more aimed at the author of the design gallery sites, not yourself.
If that makes sense!
Also ‘Best of’ and ‘Photography’ are 2 seperate categeries, just a small point
If you look at it like ‘Best of Photography’ then by all means it deserves its place.
ok..nice template…but this idea is really strange!
I like this website, it’s more user friendly then similar flash websites.
Only the ‘time of day’ list is too long for my screen and I can’t scroll to the end. (1280x800px)
Agreed Rob