I echo the remark above, the technical execution is a bit of a let down & there is a marked lack of visual order on every page.
It runs pretty slow on my computer as well, probably due to the animated star field, which is unfortunate as the movement doesn’t add a great deal to the site.
Normally I’m not one to knock the submissions to this gallery but I’m guessing this one got in purely because of the various gimmicks employed.
I think, honestly, this one needs some work to be worthy of its place.
Hmm, it seems a little confused to me as it uses HTML5, which can handle rotations etc, but it uses a HUGE background image for the angled content in the subpages.
It also runs very slowly on my machine, but I think this is the background as well.
5 Comments
Pretty cool site.. the angles on the sides of the page are choppy, it looks pretty terrible.
Nice concept.
But…
I echo the remark above, the technical execution is a bit of a let down & there is a marked lack of visual order on every page.
It runs pretty slow on my computer as well, probably due to the animated star field, which is unfortunate as the movement doesn’t add a great deal to the site.
Normally I’m not one to knock the submissions to this gallery but I’m guessing this one got in purely because of the various gimmicks employed.
I think, honestly, this one needs some work to be worthy of its place.
great site, although I agree with geo, the sides are choppy.
Hmm, it seems a little confused to me as it uses HTML5, which can handle rotations etc, but it uses a HUGE background image for the angled content in the subpages.
It also runs very slowly on my machine, but I think this is the background as well.
Not keen on this one.
Cool style!