Yeah, this is pretty horrible stuff. All the links are images!
dudeydudedude Says:
October 29th, 2008 at 9:37 pm
Typical.
Stick some texture or some photo stuff in the bg, and it shows up here.
Create a beautiful minimalist website, and you would be super lucky to see it on this gallery (and if it is, even if it’s superb and by a world-class agency, it’s still not getting the “best of” tag, because it doesn’t have textures.)
Best Web Gallery?
Hardly.
vuego Says:
October 30th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
@dudeydudedude
Can you recommend any other gallery type places I should be looking at for good design?
@dudeydudedude : well said.
The gallery has some strange lookin’ peeps and even stranger looking camel toes.
this site only showcases 1 person’s taste - the owner of the site. or so at least that’s how it appears. At least the ugly sites get the comments rolling. it may be just strategy.
I still think this is one of the best Css galleries around.
The percentage of quality vs not-so-quality sites featured here are much higher than anywhere else.
dudeydudedude Says:
November 12th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
@David:
I actually agree with you, which is why I still come back. However, anybody who knows (or studied) even a little bit about professional design would disagree with a number of sites showing up here.
Granted, as you said, there are far more crappy galleries that are run by non-designers, which are far, far worse, and unfortunately are extremely popular (*cough*cssmania*cough*).
However, because BWG is run by a designer, one would expect a higher standard than the number of rubbish “textured” sites present on this gallery.
James Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 10:02 am
This website sucks ass. Syc Fuk == FAIL
Jamie Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 10:10 am
but there are hot girls in the Photos section. Gets a couple points from me (o___________o)
Rich Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 11:14 am
The website is nicely experimental and creative but it’s far from perfect
DB Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 1:47 pm
Gets my vote for the candy but not website :p
David Perel Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Not digging this site at all.
craigH Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
not sure about this site cant understand why its here.
Yeah Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 6:17 pm
ungood. the chicks are a little trashy and that one rapper guy looks like he’s never seen a girl up close.
Pat Says:
October 28th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
This is one of those “the thumbnail looks cool” websites.
evan Says:
October 29th, 2008 at 12:47 am
Sorry, not diggin’ it at all.
PTouch Says:
October 29th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
how did this get on here? LAME!
Doug Says:
October 29th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
Syc Fuk? ORLY?
Yeah, this is pretty horrible stuff. All the links are images!
dudeydudedude Says:
October 29th, 2008 at 9:37 pm
Typical.
Stick some texture or some photo stuff in the bg, and it shows up here.
Create a beautiful minimalist website, and you would be super lucky to see it on this gallery (and if it is, even if it’s superb and by a world-class agency, it’s still not getting the “best of” tag, because it doesn’t have textures.)
Best Web Gallery?
Hardly.
vuego Says:
October 30th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
@dudeydudedude
Can you recommend any other gallery type places I should be looking at for good design?
Ptouch Says:
October 31st, 2008 at 8:13 pm
http://www.minimalsites.com (has some humdingers)
Jade Says:
November 3rd, 2008 at 6:03 am
Wow I love bestwebgallery and I come here all the time ….
untill I saw this website ….
how can you do it to me bestwebgallery… =(
author Says:
November 4th, 2008 at 12:17 am
@dudeydudedude : well said.
The gallery has some strange lookin’ peeps and even stranger looking camel toes.
this site only showcases 1 person’s taste - the owner of the site. or so at least that’s how it appears. At least the ugly sites get the comments rolling. it may be just strategy.
David Perel Says:
November 5th, 2008 at 5:28 am
I still think this is one of the best Css galleries around.
The percentage of quality vs not-so-quality sites featured here are much higher than anywhere else.
dudeydudedude Says:
November 12th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
@David:
I actually agree with you, which is why I still come back. However, anybody who knows (or studied) even a little bit about professional design would disagree with a number of sites showing up here.
Granted, as you said, there are far more crappy galleries that are run by non-designers, which are far, far worse, and unfortunately are extremely popular (*cough*cssmania*cough*).
However, because BWG is run by a designer, one would expect a higher standard than the number of rubbish “textured” sites present on this gallery.