Stick some texture or some photo stuff in the bg, and it shows up here.
Create a beautiful minimalist website, and you would be super lucky to see it on this gallery (and if it is, even if it’s superb and by a world-class agency, it’s still not getting the “best of” tag, because it doesn’t have textures.)
@dudeydudedude : well said.
The gallery has some strange lookin’ peeps and even stranger looking camel toes.
this site only showcases 1 person’s taste – the owner of the site. or so at least that’s how it appears. At least the ugly sites get the comments rolling. it may be just strategy.
I actually agree with you, which is why I still come back. However, anybody who knows (or studied) even a little bit about professional design would disagree with a number of sites showing up here.
Granted, as you said, there are far more crappy galleries that are run by non-designers, which are far, far worse, and unfortunately are extremely popular (*cough*cssmania*cough*).
However, because BWG is run by a designer, one would expect a higher standard than the number of rubbish “textured” sites present on this gallery.
20 Comments
This website sucks ass. Syc Fuk == FAIL
but there are hot girls in the Photos section. Gets a couple points from me (o___________o)
The website is nicely experimental and creative but it’s far from perfect
Gets my vote for the candy but not website :p
Not digging this site at all.
not sure about this site cant understand why its here.
ungood. the chicks are a little trashy and that one rapper guy looks like he’s never seen a girl up close.
This is one of those “the thumbnail looks cool” websites.
Sorry, not diggin’ it at all.
how did this get on here? LAME!
Syc Fuk? ORLY?
Yeah, this is pretty horrible stuff. All the links are images!
Typical.
Stick some texture or some photo stuff in the bg, and it shows up here.
Create a beautiful minimalist website, and you would be super lucky to see it on this gallery (and if it is, even if it’s superb and by a world-class agency, it’s still not getting the “best of” tag, because it doesn’t have textures.)
Best Web Gallery?
Hardly.
@dudeydudedude
Can you recommend any other gallery type places I should be looking at for good design?
http://www.minimalsites.com (has some humdingers)
Wow I love bestwebgallery and I come here all the time ….
untill I saw this website ….
how can you do it to me bestwebgallery… =(
@dudeydudedude : well said.
The gallery has some strange lookin’ peeps and even stranger looking camel toes.
this site only showcases 1 person’s taste – the owner of the site. or so at least that’s how it appears. At least the ugly sites get the comments rolling. it may be just strategy.
I still think this is one of the best Css galleries around.
The percentage of quality vs not-so-quality sites featured here are much higher than anywhere else.
@David:
I actually agree with you, which is why I still come back. However, anybody who knows (or studied) even a little bit about professional design would disagree with a number of sites showing up here.
Granted, as you said, there are far more crappy galleries that are run by non-designers, which are far, far worse, and unfortunately are extremely popular (*cough*cssmania*cough*).
However, because BWG is run by a designer, one would expect a higher standard than the number of rubbish “textured” sites present on this gallery.
I think the website is hot.. the chicks are hot and the gear is super fresh…
mad haterz on here !!! whats up with that?
the SYC FUK site is def keeping true to its image with the design. PUNK ROCK… i give it two fists in the air of approval !!!
and they got smoking hot models and incredible product on their site !!!
Rock the FUK on !!!
- SYC FUK + till – Death and Beyond + !!!