I’m not a fan of the type being used for @font-face… just really dislike it. I’m a big typography guy so that’s the first thing that stands out to me… It seems cheapy. Other than that the site is just okay imo.
Will be interesting to see how they layout the page navigation at the footer once they have 3 or 4 + pages
@Alice – How does it fit the style of their work? I’m sure since their branding is based off that typeface, must have something to do with it. Either way I don’t like it, it looks a little cheap to me. Maybe it’s just the aliasing, I don’t know, just doesn’t adhere to my taste
The site itself is alright. Clean and easy to read for a blog.
The paper design work they do, however, is terrific.
@Rich – Regarding the font, I feel it’s obvious why Alice said it fit the style of their work. Take a look at their paper design work. Then look at the font. Both are whimsical and not overly serious.
I don’t really like the contrast of the font when used with Arial, but I’m not commenting on that. I just wanted to say that I think that font fits well with their imaginative paper scenes they like doing.
14 Comments
So particular this blog.A nice idea. Good works and easy to read.
If nothing else, the name of the site is pure awesome. Oh, and the work isn’t that bad either.
I’m not a fan of the type being used for @font-face… just really dislike it. I’m a big typography guy so that’s the first thing that stands out to me… It seems cheapy. Other than that the site is just okay imo.
Will be interesting to see how they layout the page navigation at the footer once they have 3 or 4 + pages
@rich – I like the font, fits the style of their work. one of the posts mentioned they made the font themselves which i found interesting.
@Alice – How does it fit the style of their work? I’m sure since their branding is based off that typeface, must have something to do with it. Either way I don’t like it, it looks a little cheap to me. Maybe it’s just the aliasing, I don’t know, just doesn’t adhere to my taste
Really like the grid vs. list view option.
The site itself is alright. Clean and easy to read for a blog.
The paper design work they do, however, is terrific.
@Rich – Regarding the font, I feel it’s obvious why Alice said it fit the style of their work. Take a look at their paper design work. Then look at the font. Both are whimsical and not overly serious.
I don’t really like the contrast of the font when used with Arial, but I’m not commenting on that. I just wanted to say that I think that font fits well with their imaginative paper scenes they like doing.
Maybe it is nice. I personally don’t see anything, other than that is is clean, but too clean.
Too much white empty space.
The navigation is interesting but quite unhandy.
You have to click over and over again for that menu to open?! Not a good idea.
I think it’s classy, the typography is quite quirky which adds an nice element into the design. Good job!
A nice design. I really like the site
I feel it’s obvious why Alice said it fit the style of their work. Take a look at their paper design work
The site itself is alright. Clean and easy to read for a blog.
The paper design work they do, however, is terrific.
I like this too.
Would be good if it really.